Tuesday, 31 January 2017

Audience


  • Hypodermic needle theory: This states that the mass audience could be 'injected' with messages created by media producers.
  • UK age rating, USA age rating
  • Hall and Holmes (1998): "Any media text is created for a particular audience and will usually appeal most to this particular target audience"
  • Blumler and Katz (1974) suggested that there are 4 possible reasons why an audience might consume a media text:
- Entertainment

- Information/Surveillance (information gathering e.g. news, weather reports, holiday programs etc.)

-Socialisation 

-Personal relationships (using the media for emotional and other interactions e.g. soap operas for family life or the cinema for a social event)

Types of audience:

  • Mass audience: Large mainstream audiences who consume mainstream or popular culture (Marxist would claim this audience is largely made up of the 'working class' such as Eastenders, Hollywood films, Premier Football etc. High culture is usually associated with broadsheets, ballet, operas and BBC 4. 

  • Niche audience: Smaller than a mass audience but usually very influential e.g. those Marxist would define as upper/middle class who controlled the media may wish to see ‘high culture’ programs hence the launch of BBC Four for those who wish to hear or see artistic high culture programs. Niche audiences don’t have to be this group, they can be any small dedicated group who advertisers feel are worth targeting products for. Examples include, 'adult movies', fishing magazines, farming programs.

The impact of age ratings in the contemporary film industry

When creating an audience demographic, a film production company commonly looks at 5 things: age, gender, nationality, race and interests. This is used in many forms of media, and helps them decide who to aim their products at. In 1998, Halls and Holmes stated that "Any media text is created for a particular audience and will usually appeal most to this particular target audience”. In the film industry, a film needs to be targeted at the correct audience in order to gross a profit. Because of this, a lot of money is funded into audience research, especially by Hollywood who have the financial advantage over the British film industry. Many Hollywood films target a mass audience, whereas British films are usually pitched at more niche audiences. Dowey (2003) suggests "the UK should produce more commercial products but should not stop producing art-cinema productions". This is a valid point, because the British film industry usually do exceptionally well with creative films, but we also need films that made exceptionally large profits in order to be on a more level playing field with the Hollywood film industry.


The Hypodermic Needle Theory was constructed by a group of social scientists, who believed that the mass audience could be 'injected' with messages created by media producers. Some critics believe that there is an element of truth to this model, hence why certain products are banned and age restrictions exist. Age restrictions are put in place due the fact that young children are gullible and easily influenced e.g. seeing a violent film may make them want to be violent to others. This theory is not factual, and the idea that the media 'brainwashes' people has little evidence to support this notion.

Statistically, 15 - 24 year olds are the most frequent cinema goers, making up around 47% of total cinema admissions. This is due to the fact that those belonging to this age group have the most  leisure time and money. Hollywood take this into account when rating films, which is why many of them are 15s and very few are rated 18. Hollywood also make PG and 12 rated films, which widens their audience and appeal to families with young children. However, in the 1990s, many British film makers ignored this research and gave their films (such as Trainspotting, Snatch etc.) 18 ratings, which means a large % of teenagers cannot see these films, and many adults were put off as they thought that because the films had the highest age rating possible, they would be too violent/gruesome for them. Doing this narrowed the audience demographic, therefore giving Hollywood the advantage because they produce a variety of films that appeal to a range of audiences as well as lowering the age range for many of their films.
However in more recent times (2000-2016) the British film industry have created more films that appeal to mass audiences. Although these films have to involve Hollywood as a production/distribution company, they are still financial successes for the British film industry. Examples of these British successes would be James Bond, Harry Potter and Love Actually. This does not negatively affect creative art-type British films, which are still being made to cater for niche audiences who do not enjoy Hollywood films made for 'straight, middle class white audiences' (Medhurst, 1997).
In my opinion, I agree with age ratings for films, especially in the knowledge of how children are easily influenced by what they see around them. Therefore if they see violence/fighting of any kind this may make them want to fight their peers to 'show off'. This loosely links in with the Hypodermic needle theory, because the media is expressing something that children may want to copy. The media also has power over young girls in terms of body image, because they are giving them unrealistic expectations on how society wants them to look. This links back to my previous point - there needs to be restrictions on what young children are able to see. Having these age restrictions warns people what the film contains and why it may not be suitable for certain audiences.




Thursday, 26 January 2017

Production Cycle

Pre Production:

  • Producer/studio acquires rights to film story OR an independent production company chooses a production company/distributor. Hollywood has the advantage as it has more money to spend securing the rights to films. 
  • Screenplay is developed. Hollywood can employ more writers and the 'best talent'.
  • Production finance and cast/crew are confirmed, locations confirmed, scheduling takes place, call sheets are created, costume fittings, equipment organised. Advantage to Hollywood.

Production:

  • Principle photography takes place in studios and/or on agreed locations (on average this takes around 3 months). Hollywood has the advantage as access to vertical integration means access to studios, equipment etc. Can afford to spend longer on shoots.
Post Production:

(first 2 stages funded by production company, the other stages are funded by the distribution company)

  • Post production (editing and scoring) occurs/takes place, necessary test screenings take place after the producer receives feedback from the primary target audience (could include reshooting some scenes). Hollywood have the advantage - more money to spend on music rights, editing equipment/technology, employees
  • Master print of finished film delivered to distributor. USA distributors have the advantage as they can afford to produce more prints for blanket release. 
  • Distributors decide on national and international release dates and strategies (when/where/how, film premieres or festivals etc.)
  • Distributors presents film to exhibitors and negotiates bilateral agreements to have film shown in cinemas
  • Distributors marketing campaign creates 'hype' amongst target audience and launches film via different forms of marketing. Hollywood conglomerates have the advantage as they can use synergy across a range of media platforms
  • Prints delivered to cinemas a few days before opening - Advantage to Hollywood because multiplex cinemas are loyal to Hollywood films for profit reasons. 
  • The films run extends any number of weeks subject to demand
  • Marketing of home media begins after the film has left cinemas. Hollywood has more to spend on marketing.
  • Film is released on DVD, Blu-Ray and becomes available to download. Home media sales is often where British films make the most profit - more level playing field as the production cost of DVDS is less than the cost of production reels. 




Sunday, 22 January 2017

Film Essay

Throughout history, British and American Cinema have competed with each other to gain the most financial success in the film industry. British Cinema dominated the film industry throughout the 1920s and towards the end of the second world war, because they produced war films as a form of propaganda, in order to boost morale amongst British citizens. However, American cinema had the advantage when The UK film studies were destroyed after the war. In 1941, Hollywood produced the popular mystery drama, Citizen Kane, which made an profitable $1.6 million at the box office. 

In the 1960s, Britain produced many Carry On Films, which boosted the comedy genre and proved to be very popular with British viewers, because it gave them characters and themes that are easy to relate to. The first James Bond film, Dr No was released in 1962 and was a financial success for British Cinema, earning $59.5 million at the box office. However, Alfred Hitchcock, a famous British film director, moved to Hollywood, despite being England's best director. At the time, America was suffering from The Vietnam War and Civil Rights Protests, where inequality was still sadly present all throughout America. In spite of these issues Hollywood were still producing Science Fiction and Spy films. It also produced the exceedingly successful musical drama film 'The Sound Of Music' in 1965, which made an impressive $286.2 million at the box office. By November 1965 it had become the highest-grossing film of all time, and held this position for 5 years.

The 1970s was an important decade for technology, with Britain inventing computers and both Britain and America creating film trailers to be viewed by audiences on televisions. Britain produced drama film 'The Railway Children' which immediately became a financial success, but not in comparison to George Lucas's 'Star Wars' film which made $775.4 million at the box office. It surpassed 'Jaws' to become the highest grossing film of all time until E.T was released in 1982. Today it has been regarded as 'one of the best films of all time' and has since had many sequels, with the latest instalment, Rogue One, being released later last year (2016).

The 1980s began with the bleakest outlook ever seen for British film. Most of the well heeled British companies pulled out of British production all together or were just about to. Competition from TV and video caused damage to the British Box Office, and it plummeted from 101 million admissions in 1980 to 54 million in 1984. Whereas Americas film industry was booming, and continuing to produce financial successes such as Top Gun, Ghostbusters, Return Of The Jedi and The Empire Strikes Back.

Following a disappointing decade, the British Film industry came back with successful comedy drama film 'Trainspotting' in 1996. The film was nominated for an Academy Award and has been ranked 10th by the BFI in its list of Top 100 British Films of all time. The budget for the film was £1.5 million, and it made £48 million at the box office. Whilst this was a financial success, the American box office soared when James Cameron produced 'Titanic' with a budget of $200 million, and was the first film to reach the billion dollar mark in the film industry, making $2.187 billion at the box office. 'Titanic' was nominated for 14 Academy Awards and became the highest grossing film of all time until James Cameron's 'Avatar' in 2009.

In the 2000s the British film industry soared when 'Harry Potter and the Philosophers Stone' was produced in 2001 and made $974.8 million at the box office. Because the film was based on a series of books by J.K Rowling, she insisted on the film being completely British, which ensured that it wasn't turned into a Hollywood blockbuster. In America (2007-2008), a Television Writers Strike took place for 100 days/14 weeks and 2 days. A year later 'Avatar' was released, and its new use of technology and filming techniques proved its uniqueness amongst Sci-Fi fantasy films. The film made an outstanding $2.788 billion at the box office, making it the first ever film to gross over $2 billion. It was nominated for 9 Academy Awards and still remains the highest grossing film of all time after surpassing 'Titanic'.

From 2010 - current day Britain and America's film industries are more equal now in comparison to previous decades, but Hollywood has the advantage by having more money, being more well known and popular and having their pick of world famous actors and actresses. Also, their cameras and technology can be used for a range of different Hollywood films, whereas if Britain needed a special type of camera it would need to make, loan or buy one. Britain's film industry has been successful over the financial stability coming from popular films such as 'Skyfall' and the Harry Potter instalments. 'The Kings Speech' was also a big success after it made $414.2 million at the box office and won 7 British Academy Film Awards and 4 Academy Awards. Hollywood is continuing to produce many superhero films such as 'The Avengers' and 'Iron Man' as well as sequels to these films -  'Avengers Assemble' and 'Iron Man 2'.





Thursday, 19 January 2017

Finance

As Hanseen (2007) summarised, 'The Hollywood studio system era' of vertical integration that impacted production, distribution and exhibition (because the major companies owned the cinemas) came to an end in 1948; "when the USA Supreme Court issued its famous Paramount decision. The Paramount consent decree required the divestiture of affiliated cinema chains and the abandonment of a number of vertical practices" 

This means that the five major conglomerates (Fox, MGM, Paramount, RKO and Warner Brothers) and the partly integrated companies (Columbia, Universal and United Artists - N.B MGM have now bought out United Artists) had to compete on a more level playing field with other film companies. Companies like Walt Disney weren't allowed to own cinemas, which allowed them to show their own films constantly, which gave independent film companies more of a chance.

In The UK, we don't have major conglomerate production companies that have the resources to internally fund their own films. Instead funding, secured by independent production companies (like Warp who produced This is England), generally comes from a number of investors/sources.

There are three forms of British films differentiated by the amount of non-British funding they receive, they are as follows:
* British - solely funded with British money (an example being Trainspotting)
* Co-funded - a large amount of funding comes from European or US investment (an example being Love Actually)
* Inward funded - the majority of funds or all of the funds come from the USA even though the film is a 'British Production' (key examples being the Harry Potter and James Bond franchises).

Average annual UK Productions:
Under £2 million - 30
£2-£5 million - 30
£5-£10 million - 15
£10+ million - 6


Common sources of British funding include:


  • The BFI
  • Film 4
  • The BBC
  • National Lottery Grants
  • Government Grants - However the Conservative grants do not offer as many art/film grants as Labour in the past

Production Company Logos


http://www.therichest.com/rich-list/the-biggest/the-10-biggest-hollywood-studios/

Top Hollywood Production Companies





Top Hollywood Distribution Companies






Paramount Pictures, Columbia Pictures



Top British Production Companies








Tuesday, 17 January 2017

The Rise and Fall of British Cinema


  • 1920-1945:
UK - The World War meant that war films were popular - they were used as propaganda to boost morale

USA - The UK film studios were destroyed after the war. Citizen Kane, Orson Wells

  • 1960s:

 UK - Carry On Films were popular and boosted the comedy genre. Spartacus, Alfred Hitchcock was British but left the country to go to America/Hollywood. Spy films - James Bond.

USA -  Vietnam War, Civil Rights Protesters. Sound of Music, Sci-Fi, Spy films.

  • 1970s:
UK - Computers invented, TV trailers, The Railway Children

USA - TV trailers, George Lucas, Star Wars, Stephen Spielberg

  • 1980s:
Trainspotting?

Jaws?

  • 1990s:
UK - 

USA - Titanic, James Cameron

  • 2000s:

UK - JK Rowling, Harry Potter, Shaun of the dead

USA - Writer strike, Avatar

  • 2010-2017:
UK - The Kings Speech, Harry Potter, Skyfall

USA - Superhero films




Thursday, 12 January 2017

History of the British Film Industry

Avatar

Mise-en-scene Army uniforms, futuristic technology and laboratories, weapons, helicopters

Where is the action set? Pandora

Who are the stars?

Sam Worthington - Jake Sully
Zoe Saldana - Neytiri
Sigourney Weaver - Dr. Grace Augustine
Stephen Lang - Colonel Miles Quaritch
Michelle Rodriguez - Trudy Chacon

What is the lighting like? Classic Sci-fi genre - blue colours

What are the costumes like? Many of the humans wear casual clothing e.g t-shirts, jeans etc. The Na'vi have very little clothing to show that they live in the wilderness. 

What is the genre? Fantasy, Science Fiction

What is the script like?

What is the camera work (image quality/range of shots etc.) like?

What is the editing (special effects etc.) like?

What do you think the budget was for the film? $237 million

Who do you think the primary target audience is? 16 - 24 years olds of both genders, but maybe more towards males

Do you think the film made a profit? Yes, the 3D effects were so advanced and had never been seen before

What film genres do you think Britain and America are stereotypically famous for based on these trailers and your own prior knowledge of films?

Tuesday, 3 January 2017

My Hollywood Case Study

The Hangover
Production: 
* Which company produced the film? Legendary Pictures, Green Hat Films, Benderspink
* Where did the funding come from?  Warner Bros. funded the film, who already had millions in their budget from previous big box office hits.
* What the production budget was. $35 million
* What year it was filmed. 2009
* How long did filming take? 3 months
*Where was it filmed? California, Nevada
* What equipment was used for filming? Panavision Panaflex Millennium XL, Panavision Primo Lens 
* Nationality? American
* Who owns the source material? Warner Bros.
* Who the main producer, director, cinematographer, editor, screen writer and music providers were. 
Producers - Daniel Goldberg, Todd Phillips
Director - Todd Phillips
Cinematographer - Lawrence Sher
Editor - Debra Neil - Fisher
Screen writers - Jon Lucas, Scott Moore
Music provider - Christophe Beck
* Who the principle cast members are (star vehicles).
Ed Helms - Dr Stuart Price
Bradley Cooper - Philip Wenneck
Zach Galifianakis - Alan Garner
Justin Bartha - Douglas Billings
Ken Jeong - Leslie Chow

* Any other production information e.g. any problems?  'physically demanding' A few injuries filming the action scenes

 Distribution: 
 * Distribution company US - Warner Bros. Pictures
 * Marketing budget   $35 million
 * Test screening information
 * Release pattern 62 countries from The Netherlands - 30th May 2009 to Japan - 20th October 2011
 * Examples of marketing and promotion  Social Media platforms (Facebook, Twitter) which yielded an estimated 2.5 million impressions over social media.
 * What other media is it available on? DVD, Blu-Ray, YouTube, free movie sites, app stores
 * Any other information e.g, difficulties getting a
                     distributor?  Difficulties with the film title 'What Happens in Vegas' - New Line Pictures said they would only buy the script if the film was called 'What Happens in Vegas' but too many people claimed to have come up with it, so they rejected the script. The writers went off and wanted a raise, which was rejected by many film studios. Director Todd Phillips was then attached to the project and put it to Warner Bros. who then bought the script for $2 million

 Exhibition

 * Types of cinema shown in (Imax, 3D, MM, I, AH)
 * How long was it was on for
 * Box office figures   $467.5 million
 * Age classification (UK/USA)   15
 * Who the primary target audience was. Males aged 18-34
 * Success (compare to DVD/Blue-ray/download)
* Any other information e.g. did it get kept in cinemas longer than planned due to how successful it proved?

My British Case Study

The Inbetweeners Movie

Production notes:

* Which company produced the film?  Bwark Productions, Film4 Productions, Young Films
* Where did the funding come from? Channel 4 funded the film (who receive funding from adverts and deals etc.)
* What was the production budget?  £3.5 million
* What year was it filmed?  2011
* How long did filming take? Started filming in May, took a break because of fans and returned in winter
* Where was it filmed?  UK, Spain and Greece
* What equipment was used for filming? Ari Alexa, Cooke S4, Angenieux Optimo Lenses
* Nationality? British
* Who owns the source material? Channel 4
* Who the main producer, director, cinematographer, editor, screen writer and music providers were. 
Producer - Christopher Young
Director - Ben Palmer
Cinematographer - Ben Wheeler
Editors - Charlie Fawcett, William Webb
Screen writers - Iain Morris, Damon Beesley
Music providers - David Arnold, Michael Price, Mike Skinner

* Who the principle cast members are (star vehicles). 
Simon Bird - Will Mackenzie
James Buckley - Jay Cartwright
Blake Harrison - Neil Sutherland
Joe Thomas - Simon Cooper

* Any other production information e.g. any problems? Problems filming in Malia because of the overcrowded streets. Over enthusiastic fans made it impossible to film.

Distribution: 
 * Distribution company UK - Entertainment Film Distributors
 * Marketing budget  £3.5 million
 * Test screening information Positive feedback, the audience were pleased with the narrative and characters
 * Release pattern -
Released in 26 different countries from The UK - 17th August 2011 to Hungary - 27th October 2012

 * Examples of marketing and promotion Mainly used social networking sites - # on Twitter and Facebook Page. Also advertised on the side of pot noodle packaging and YouTube trailers. Twitter accounts were also made of the characters, which reached over 100,000 followers.
 * What other media is it available on?
 Online film sites such as iTunes, Love Film and Netflix as well as many others 

 Exhibition

 * Types of cinema shown in (Imax, 3D, MM, I, AH) Showcase Cinemas?
 * How long was it was on for
 * Box office figures  £2.5 million on the first day, £41.8 million overall
 * Age classification UK - 15
 * Who the primary target audience was 15 - 25 year olds, preferably those who had seen the TV series
 * Success (compare to DVD/Blue-ray/download
On the 12th December 2011, The Inbetweeners Movie was released on DVD and Blu-Ray in the UK, and by the 17th December, estimated sales reached 1 million.
* Any other information e.g. did it get kept in cinemas longer than planned due to how successful it proved?



What is a British film?

ANAs critic McDougall (2008) states there are various 'official' ways of categorising British films. The most common is through using the following categories defined by the BFI (British Film Institute):


Category A: Films made with British money, personnel and resources.
Category B: Films co-funded with money from British and from foreign investment, but for which the majority of finance, cultural content and personnel are British.
Category C: Films with mostly foreign money (but non USA) investment and a small British input either financially or creatively.
Category D: Films made in the UK with (usually) British cultural content, but financed fully or partly by US companies.
Category E: US films with some British involvement. 

10 British films (from 2009-2016):

  • Sherlock Holmes (Adventure - 2009).
  • Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (Fantasy, adventure - 2009).
  • The King's Speech (Historical drama - 2010).
  • Robin Hood (Drama - 2010).
  • Paul (Science Fiction, comedy - 2011).
  • The Inbetweeners Movie (Comedy, 2011). 
  • Gnomeo & Juliet (Animation, fantasy, comedy - 2011).
  • Johnny English Reborn (Action, comedy - 2011).
  • Tinker Taylor Soldier Spy (Thriller - 2011).
  • The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel (Comedy, drama - 2011).